Showing posts with label north carolina politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label north carolina politics. Show all posts

Submit Questions for Run-off Forums


Ask the Candidates.

NBC17 is producing, with the League of Women Voters of North Carolina and the help of local Leagues, a number of televised candidate debates this year. 
Coming up are 

1. runoff debate for the Democratic US Senate primary race Tues, June 15 (live and available statewide) from 8-9 pm with Cunningham and Marshall going head-to-head 
2. runoff debate for US House District 13 Republican primary race June 1 from 8-9 pm with Randall and Reeves debating
3. runoff debate for US House District 8 Republican primary race June 8 from 8-9 pm with D'Annuncio and Johnson debating

Get Answers! The candidates will answer questions submitted by NC residents. Please share this information widely. 
If you live in House District 13 or 8, we especially would like questions from local constituents for your candidates.
Voters can send their questions for the candidates to myvote@wncn.com, and should include their first and last name along with their city/county of residence.
DISTRICT-13 Deadline for questions: Noon on Thursday, May 27

DISTRICT-8 Deadline for questions: Noon on Friday, June 4

SENATE RUNOFF Deadline for questions: Noon on Friday, June 11
 
We produced a live US Senatorial Democratic primary race debate May 17 from 7:30-9:00 pm with 5 candidates. This was also available statewide on TV and on the web.
 
Information is from the North Carolina League of Women Voters.
LWVNC President
46 Haywood St. #309
Asheville, NC 28801




Run-Off Candidate Forums for US Sen., Hse.Dist. 8 and 13



Submit Questions for Run-off debates ! ! !

NBC17 is producing, with the League of Women Voters of North Carolina and the help of local Leagues, a number of televised candidate debates this year. 
Coming up are 

1. runoff debate for the Democratic US Senate primary race Tues, June 15 (live and available statewide) from 8-9 pm with Cunningham and Marshall going head-to-head 
2. runoff debate for US House District 13 Republican primary race June 1 from 8-9 pm with Randall and Reeves debating
3. runoff debate for US House District 8 Republican primary race June 8 from 8-9 pm with D'Annuncio and Johnson debating

Get Answers! The candidates will answer questions submitted by NC residents. Please share this information widely. 
If you live in House District 13 or 8, we especially would like questions from local constituents for your candidates.
Voters can send their questions for the candidates to myvote@wncn.com, and should include their first and last name along with their city/county of residence.
DISTRICT-13 Deadline for questions: Noon on Thursday, May 27

DISTRICT-8 Deadline for questions: Noon on Friday, June 4

SENATE RUNOFF Deadline for questions: Noon on Friday, June 11
 
We produced a live US Senatorial Democratic primary race debate May 17 from 7:30-9:00 pm with 5 candidates. This was also available statewide on TV and on the web.
 
Information is from the North Carolina League of Women Voters.
LWVNC President
46 Haywood St. #309
Asheville, NC 28801

 
 
 



Can this be Possible? ?

Has a standing committee of the North Carolina Senate (Ways and Means) had no meetings since 2001?

From an e-mail I received from The NC Property Rights Coalition:

"On May 24, the eminent domain amendment (HB 878) passed the NC House by a vote of 104-15. On May 29, the bill was referred to the N.C. Senate's Ways & Means Committee. It has not been acted on since.

On Monday, a representative of the N.C. Property Rights Coalition called the office of Sen. Charlie Dannelly, Chairman of the Ways & Means Committee, and asked when the Ways & Means Committee last met.

Sen. Dannelly's assistant's answer:
2001."

More details on the coalition blog, as well as details about a news conference July 19, 2007.

Traffic NO-NO

_____

I love crosswords. They are an exercise in thinking about things in different ways. Yesterday I was working on the crossword puzzle in the Saturday edition of the News and Record. I found the answer to one of the clues doesn't apply to Greensboro. The clue was "a traffic no-no." The answer was UTURN.

In Greensboro and in many other cities nowadays, it is almost impossible to drive anywhere without at least one U-turn. These annoying medians that are using up transportation funds that could be used in better ways are causing many U-turns. Many are made around medians that are not wide enough to accomodate the full length of an average-size passenger vehicle.

It seems to me that the medians would cause more accidents and traffic back-ups. And while I am on the traffic track, I have some comments on red light traffic cameras. I think they are a good idea. The money trail could be worked out. I think that one of the main reasons the traffic light program failed is not because of a law that most of the profits have to go to schools. I think that one reason the program failed is because offenders had to pay first and appeal later. Because the fine was relatively small, and there was no violation record to increase insurance costs, there was very little incentive to hire a lawyer and no profits for insurance companies. Lawyers and Insurance Companies hate that.

The NC legislature could change the law to bring back traffic cameras by allowing a better distribution of the fines. I guess that the law-makers in NC are too busy taking care of trivia and campaign fund-raising to even think about doing much useful work.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE ? ? ?

-----
The North Carolina General Assembly passed legislation this week authorizing the Town of Chapel Hill to sponsor it's own public financing program for candidates in municipal elections in 2009 and 2011. Text of bill (H-483).

The Town Council unanimously requested this authority. The program is not for this year. It is only for elections in 2009 and 2011. It must be reauthorized if it is to continue after that.

Public financing for elections seems like a good idea on the surface; but, I have serious doubts about the long-term effectiveness and expense.

Sticking it to Energy Consumers

----

The NC Senate approved Senate Bill 3, Renewable Energy/Baseload Provisions on second reading. This bill started out similar to House Bill 77, Promote Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, sponsored by Representatives Martin, Harrell, Justice, and Harrison (Guilford). After months of negotiations, the Senate bill was loaded up with provisions to get buy-in from a variety of interest groups, from Wal-mart to homebuilders to chemical companies, and especially the utilities. As a result, there are many troubling provisions in the bill, which hopefully will be fixed in the House version.

One bad provision relates to financing new nuclear and coal fired power plants. It would shift the risk from the investors to the rate payers. This fight was fought in the early 1980s, and the consumers prevailed, but not this time around in the Senate bill.

Another bad provision encourages energy production from hog farms that use outdated lagoon-and-sprayfield technologies. This will have the unintended consequence of prolonging the life of dirty hog-waste pools that do not meet environmental performance standards and threaten the health of citizens near them. The original bill helps hog farmers convert to better ways of disposing of waste products.

It is important that the NC House fix this bill and pass a renewable energy bill without provisions making it easier to build new coal and nuclear plants and with provisions to help get rid of lagoons filled with smelly hog excrement.

Read Sticking it to utility ratepayers
by Rick Martinez in the Raleigh N&R.

Send a message to members of the NC House. Ask them to fix this bill.

#

Hit 'em in the money bags

-----
The North Carolina House voted unanimously Tuesday, April 3, 2007, in favor of House Bill 291 that would require the state to divest its holdings in companies that do business or have strong ties to the Sudanese government. That government is accused of genocide and human rights abuses in the Darfur region. North Carolina would be the first state in the Southeast to enact such a ban if the bill becomes law, supporters say. Treasurer Richard Moore has already taken steps on his own to sell the State’s holdings in nine companies that have done business with Sudan.

Take Action Today

Several huge new landfills have been proposed in eastern and central North Carolina. These large dump sites could possibly contaminate groundwater supplies and harm North Carolina's fragile ecosystems. Garbage-related industries have hired many lobbyists to attempt to block the moratorium.

Poor, Rural Counties near the coast are prime targets for garbage-related industries to push for these dump sites. The lure of using the countryside for an immediate income-producing source for the local government is strong. These county officials should consider the future harm that these landfills can do streams, rivers and near watershed areas and land with water sources close to the surface of the land.

In one coastal community there is disagreement between the town council and the county commission. Garbage-related industries are promising that a large landfill will only be used for local garbage and household trash imported from a few states. The truth is that courts have ruled that trash is a commodity. Its interstate import and export cannot be regulated by individual local governments. So, there is really nothing but a vague promise that these huge dumps will not be used to import trash from up and down the Eastern Seaboard of the US.

The Moratorium on New Landfills bill was passed by the NC Senate last week. It is now being considered in the NC House.

You can find the entire contents of the bill at this website:


http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2005/Bills/House/HTML/H1093v3.html

According to information contained in the preamble to the bill, ground water is the source of drinking water for approximately half the population of the State and depletion of certain large ground water aquifers in the State has been documented in recent years; and protection and enhancement of water quality in the State's rivers and coastal estuaries is the declared public policy of the State.
---
There are enough exceptions written into this bill to satisfy any problems that might arise out of the short moratorium and study.
SECTION 3. Exceptions. – The moratorium established by Section 2 of this act shall not prohibit consideration of an application for or issuance of:
(1) An amendment, modification, or other change to a permit for a landfill issued on or before 1 June 2006.
(2) A permit for a horizontal or vertical expansion of the landfill permitted on or before 1 June 2006.
(3) A permit to construct a new landfill within the facility boundary identified in the facility plan of a landfill permitted on or before 1 June 2006.
(4) A permit to operate a new landfill if a permit to construct the new landfill was issued on or before 1 June 2006.
(5) A permit for a sanitary landfill used only to dispose of waste generated by a coal-fired generating unit that is owned or operated by an investor-owned utility subject to the requirements of G.S. 143-215.107D.
(6) A permit for a sanitary landfill determined to be necessary by the Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources in order to respond to an imminent hazard to public health or a natural disaster.
SECTION 4. Study. – The Environmental Review Commission, with the assistance of the Division of Waste Management of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, shall study issues related to solid waste.

You can find contact information for yourrepresentative at:
http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/members/memberList.pl?sChamber=House

And more information about landfills in North Carolina at the North Carolina Conservation Network website at:
http://ncconservationnetwork1.org/campaign/landfillmoratorium/kbe8874l535ewm?

See other post on this blog about trash disposal and traveling trash and more info about dumps.

Thank you for taking action on this issue.

Thank you for taking action on this issue.

Contact The NC Legislature, please

-----

You can find a list of members of theLegislature (NC House and NC Senate) at this site:

http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/members/memberList.pl?sChamber=Senate

NC Senator Clark Jenkins (Edgecombe) has introduced a bill calling for a Moratorium Imposed on New Landfills. The bill (if made into law) would block the permitting of any new landfills for two years while the legislature studies current rules and decides how to strengthen them. The bill would also appropriate money to do a study of landfills in low-lying areas and other landfill hazards and how to strength current laws governing landfills in the state.

THIS BILL HAS ENOUGH EXCEPTIONS THAT IT WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO MOST CURRENT LEGAL LANDFILLS. See Below.
There is also a provision somewhere in the Current Budget Committee to collect a "tipping fee" for every ton of garbage dumped in North Carolina. I think that these are issues which should be considered separately.

Courts have ruled that garbage is a commodity that states cannot stop from crossing their borders. That has led to the growth of interstate shipments to places with more open space. There are several applications for landfills pending in NC at this time. The largest one is proposed for Camden County. This massive dump could be over 200 feet high and would have the capacity to bury 3 million tons of trash a year for up to 27 years. It is proposed for a 490 to 704 acre site just 3,000 feet from Hwy, 17. This pile of garbage will probably be visible for quite a distance.

http://www.waste-ind.com/camden/articles/BlackBearFactSheet.pdf

The Raleigh N&O reports that Gov. Mike Easley's budget proposal suggests a $2-per-ton statewide fee on solid waste, which would generate about $20 million. Part of the money generated by the fee would be used to help clean up about 700 inactive landfills and some abandoned polluted industrial sites across the state and provide grants to local governments for cleanups.
North Carolina currently charges no fee for trash disposal. Gov. Easley's fee proposal would include all trash disposal in North Carolina, not just imported trash.

An entire copy of the bill (S1575) can be found on the North Carolina Legislature web site.

http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2005/Bills/Senate/HTML/S1575v1.html

Short Title: Moratorium Imposed on New Landfills/Funds.
(Public)
Sponsors: Senators Jenkins; Albertson and Purcell.
Referred to: Agriculture/Environment/Natural Resources.

S.1575 will block any new approvals until January 2008, providing time for a study commission to examine how to improve siting, bonding, and operations of landfills to prevent the degradation of rural communities and the natural environment. Of course there are some exceptions in the proposal.

. . . "SECTION 2.(b)  Exceptions. – The moratorium established by subsection (a) of this section shall not prohibit consideration of an application for or issuance of:
(1) A modification of a permit for an existing permitted landfill.
(2) A permit to expand an existing permitted landfill if the proposed facility boundary will provide no more than five years of disposal capacity.
(3) A modification of a permit to reflect a transfer of ownership of an existing permitted landfill.
(4) A modification of a permit to provide for a substantial change to the waste stream described in a permit in effect as of 1 May 2006 for an existing landfill.
(5) A permit for a sanitary landfill used only to dispose of waste generated by a coal?fired generating unit that is owned or operated by an investor?owned utility subject to the requirements of G.S. 143?215.107D.
(6) A permit for a sanitary landfill determined to be necessary by the Secretary in order to respond to an imminent hazard to public health or a natural disaster . . .

-----
WHAT DO YOU THINK ?? LET YOUR REPRESENTATIVE KNOW ! ! !
Should we allow North Carolina to become the dumping ground for garbage from the entire East Coast? North Carolina's location on the coast makes it an easy dumping place for trash traveling on barges and by rail up and down the Atlantic Coast.

Don't Ignore Mercury Pollution

-----
Mercury pollution is a serious problem in NC.

Mercury is polluting our air and our water and getting into human food sources. News reports have informed us for years about this hazard to our health. The number one source of mercury emissions is coal-fired power plants. These emissions can be reduced at the source. Other states are taking measures to reduce mercury poison in the environment. NC should pass legislation to drastically reduce this hazard.

The NC Environmental Management Commission is holding a public comment period which started May 30 and will end June 30th, on whether or not NC needs stronger and faster action to reduce its mercury pollution. Time is short. Let the commission know how you feel about Mercury Pollution in NC.

Twenty-two species of fish in North Carolina are unsafe for children and women of childbearing age to eat.

Mercury can cause brain damage and developmental disabilities in unborn children.

Emissions are damaging our forests and wildlife habitats.


The number one source of mercury emissions is coal-fired power plants.

You can make your voice heard. Go to the NC Conservation Network site and Send a Message

http://ncconservationnetwork1.org/campaign/mercury_public_comment/kbe8874q535jwd?
I enjoyed a quote that a read recently in a column by Molly Ivins.

"...how would we know it was America if we didn't hear regularly from the nincompoop faction?"

BTW who belongs to that nincompoop faction?